Forum

Posts by "teich"

23 Posts by Anonymous "teich":
123
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Nov 4, 2010 23:14
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Hi Rose. Do you see AUDUSD retracing at least to 1.000 before going higher? True bullish moves do not go up in a straight line...
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Nov 4, 2010 22:33
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Hi Rose. Going straight up to 1.05 without any retracement/profit taking? Come on...
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Nov 4, 2010 21:40
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Anyone left to short AUDUSD? How much farther can it go before a retrace? All the way to 1.030?
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Nov 4, 2010 0:27
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Hi Rose. I appreciate that you post your trades. I am shorting AUDUSD too, scaling from 1.000 to 1.006; 80% position.
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Nov 2, 2010 4:25
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Nice trading, Rose.
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Oct 26, 2010 1:40
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Out for +16 pips. Enough for me.
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Oct 25, 2010 21:40
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Joining Rose; going long AUDUSD at 0.989x, 1st scale.
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Oct 25, 2010 2:26
In Thread: Commodity FX (CAD AUD NZD NOK)
Nice entry, Rose.
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Oct 16, 2010 13:36
In Thread: EUR
Hi catnip. EURUSD being range-bound is possible. I think AUDUSD migth hover around 0.98 to 1.00 too, unless the equity market tanks.
Teich
California, United States
Posted Anonymously
14 years ago
Oct 14, 2010 6:15
In Thread: EUR
Hi subway90. EURUSD at 4150/4200 would correspond to the USDX 76 level. It makes sense to get a bounce there.
Report Reply
123