Forum
Posts by "qiman"
248 Posts Total by "qiman":
20
Posts by Anonymous "qiman":
Researchers at the University of Texas at Arlington announced that they have developed a breakthrough and clean way to turn the cheapest kind of coal-lignite- into synthetic crude. "We're improving the cost every day. We started off some time ago at an uneconomical $17,000 a barrel. Today, we're at ... $28.84 a barrel," Rick Billo, UTA's dean of engineering, told an Austin television reporter.
Texas lignite coal sells for $18 a tonne. The coal conversion technology uses one tonne of coal to produce 1.5 barrels of crude oil. One barrel of crude produces 42 U.S. gallons of gasoline. In other words, $18 worth of coal yields 63 gallons of gasoline: 0.28 cents a gallon. A prototype refinery is slated for completion by the end of the year:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/texas-university-has-eureka-moment-for-coal-to-gas/article1502823/
"But some argue that Berlin is pressing too hard, and that the regions new fixation on debt has created a cult of austerity that could make it harder to recover from the slump. Drastic budget cuts, if carried out as promised, could set off deflation...."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/world/europe/18euro.html?hpw
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a7yzSkhxEkmk&pos=3
Sorry, not into harry potter at all.
Running short of time to discuss this further, but quickly: As the world's last superpower, in military terms it is disastrous that much of the oil the US needs to run its economy and military must come from overseas, supply routes can be interrupted, regardless of who owns the drilling rigs. In the event of a WWIII, this dependance could be fatal. Also, importing so much oil is a major cause of the foreign trade deficit. And why be so subject to the fact that even a small supply interruption, say due to Nigeria chaos, can cause oil prices to go up drastically. With huge natural gas supplies available, the US could eventually be in much stronger geopolitical position.
Regarding nat gas and Pickens. I agree with him 100% that we have an incredible opportunity in the US to radically reduce oil dependance with the new methods of capturing nat gas. What I don't know is if the leadership of this country will grasp the vision in time and make it a top national priority. It would create many jobs as well. If the gov gets behind it, the nat gas stocks will certainly explode.
Which is related to your other question--oil demand in the developing markets is tending towards deceleration with better fuel economy, etc. But there is so much oil growth demand in the developing world, hard to say which will win out. The abiotic theory of the Russians is very interesting. And Brazil has an amazing biofuel infrastructure, and now new deep water discoveries--it will be a major energy player in time. Iraq could make a major shift in supply as production comes back online. But the key again is timing. In the short-term I suspect military situations and hostilities could easily create another major oil spike before too long. Iran and the straight of Hormuz as just one example.
As far as nations, I believe Brazil is gaining much momentum as a power while the developed economies stumble and fumble, India as well. Russia has done little to change its long term prospects. China and the US are just about certain to clash in a major way.
We are about to enter more volatile and dangerous times. As traders we should be able to make a alot of money from these energies--taking advantage of the chaos instead of being its victim. But only if we can flow with the trends and set our biases aside quickly!