Forum

Posts by "speculator"

804 Posts Total by "speculator":
22 Posts by member
SPECULATOR
(LONDON, United Kingdom)
782 Posts by Anonymous "speculator":
speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 15:45
the bottom for USDx was 2008 we are more likely to see strength in the index for a quite a while at least based on my macroeconomic analysis.

as we enter H2 doubts over global recovery will increase sending dollar quite a bit higher. traders and investors probably over reacted to the more positive news last quarter and this is likely to lead to risk reallocation.

speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 15:28
cougr, well who says the anomaly wont happen again?
speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 15:03
cougr yes one decade may not be adequate as i would conisder that is medium term. look into the 1990s and you will agree with me.

1996 to 2000 the USDX went up nicely and so did crude.
speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 13:56
cougr your relationship hypothesis does not hold in the longer term and in all periods unless u can show me this relationship has held wholly in the last 20 years which it has not.
speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 13:38
in the early - mid 90s oil was not a good hedge for the dollar and the correlation was not negative throughout. so what makes you so confident that this relationship will not return?

speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 13:31
thanks ashraf,

so in expecting the dollar to resume its secular bear adjustment, you are predicting higher oil prices, gold and inflation as a dollar hedge?

but research shows that oil and dollar relationship over the last 20 years has been statistically insignificant and there are other factors that explain the relationship. so whilst i agree this relationship has held recently it may not always do so if we are entering a new era of trading. research has found that oil price movements were mainly explained by demand/supply dynamics.

speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 13:09
ok thanks cougr, a good point anout usdx not being able to maintain 200dma.

extrapolating trends especially longer ones will not always give you good insight as past performance is not a good indicator especially in this increasingly complex world we live in. for example, how may banks forecasted the dollar to collapse last year as US was in recession?

the highs of 2000 will not be surpassed so soon as one could argue that it will take many years to achieve if we are in a secular bull market.

i appreciate all the debt monetisation and deficits this is a dollar negative i dont disagree.

but i am still waiting for a brief answer as to WHY the demand for euro,pound and yen (components of USDx) will increase leading to a fall in USDX (everything else equal, ideally) if emerging economies do well and the rest of the world does not. is this a commodity priced linked concept?
speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 12:05
nobody is answering my question. i havent read your book yet ashraf!
speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 11:49
ok we are getting more economical here.

but if you assume BRICS do well and USA dont:

CA will fall = less dollar excesses to mop up

looking on a supply/demand basis if the dollar will sell off into BRICS currencies due to capital inflows away from the dollar then why would the dollar weaken against non-BRICS. Investors wont be buying the Euro or Pound directly.

speculator
Posted Anonymously
15 years ago
Jul 2, 2009 11:18
ashraf,

you will get the same relationship if you plot S&P 500 (not as strong) so it has got to do with risk appetite for global stocks. but if you are assume MSCI emerging markets will not be as correlated to non-emerging markets like S&P going forward then thats a different story.