Regarding ECB rate hikes and withdrawal of non-standard measures, there are a couple of points I think should be stated
The ECB's primary mandate is price stability and when watching JCT on the monthly PC during the last months (say from Nov), it is clear that he personally feels very satisfied with the track record the ECB has achieved during his term in office. He will not risk this record during his final 6 months in office!
There is also the move towards making the individual countries responsible for providing their banks with cash. The Irish CB has increased their lending using a rule that allows them to create cash, subject to ECB approval. Spain has also gotten the message and are leaning heavily on their regional/local banks.
The ECB has also learned the lesson that if they make a problem go away from the headline news, politicians will treat it as if it was solved. I'm referring to the purchasing of peripheral bonds. There has been signals from the ECB that they want to unload the 70B or so of bonds from their balance sheet and indirect that there is a limit on how much the ECB can/will hold. The political camp has been mute on this aspect but instead transformed the ECB proposal that the ESFS should by the ECB holdings to one where the ESFS funds should be used to buy more bonds from the market (Lesson: never provide a "how" to a "what" since your "how" will be stolen to solve another "what".)
In sum, JCT & the ECB are moving towards a position that the situation is, or should be, normalizing and that the political camp is responsible for that to happen - it is a sort of a fait accompli play and a rather sharp move for a non-political body...
I realize that I'm really wading in deep here with this first post, but the aspects that I bring up have not been discussed much in this forum.
Is there anyone who believes that Germany and UK will allow their banks to suffer losses due to exposure to the Irish banks, at least this time around? Is this not in fact enough to ensure that funds will be made available to Ireland('s banks)?
As to terms, some quid pro quo not endangering eventual recovery is likely - I suggest a poll about how high Ireland's corporate tax rate will be post rescue :)
Try publishing this in the UK weekend papers: Traders bet BankofEngland will raise rates to 6.25% --highest since 1… https://t.co/GWXrTEAk4R(10 months ago)
Poor start to a slow market day as Ezone PMIs disappoint. Im still keeping an eye on the rare (-2%) USD-GOLD combo,… https://t.co/UyRzWsRbs7(10 months ago)
-5% YTD is not good, while -7% from the year highs can be tough. Gold traders have their eyes fixated on this for n… https://t.co/NV5UMKsfNo(10 months ago)
ما وراء هبوط الدولار مع الذهب و من منهما يتمكن الارتداد؟
موعدنا الآن في غرفة شركة إكس أم لجلسة الأسواق
https://t.co/Y7tD0RxCS2
@XM_COM (10 months ago)
Jobless claims > 300k before next FOMC meeting would be ideal for Fed to make up for any CPI upside surprise (10 months ago)
"Cook & Eat at Home" scheme may come next to defeat UK inflation... (10 months ago)
Earlier in the week gold selloff was attributed to smaller than exp China EASING. Metal is now holding v well despi… https://t.co/ZW9cmXTPWW(10 months ago)
How bitcoin halvingreduces bitcoin inflation below that of gold and how its "hardness" can beat every other asset & currency over time. Watch here.
كيف تنخفض نسبة التضخم في بيتكوين تحت نسبة تضخم الذهب و ما يعني "صلابة" بيتكوين كعملة او إرادة؟
Latest Hot-Chart - Apr 09
Bitcoin versus Miners Performance
As many of you know 2023 was kind to members of our WhatsApp Broadcast Group who snapped up shares in bitcoin miners, while 2024 has so far been more superior to Bitcoin than most of the miners...
View Hot-Chart..
The ECB's primary mandate is price stability and when watching JCT on the monthly PC during the last months (say from Nov), it is clear that he personally feels very satisfied with the track record the ECB has achieved during his term in office. He will not risk this record during his final 6 months in office!
There is also the move towards making the individual countries responsible for providing their banks with cash. The Irish CB has increased their lending using a rule that allows them to create cash, subject to ECB approval. Spain has also gotten the message and are leaning heavily on their regional/local banks.
The ECB has also learned the lesson that if they make a problem go away from the headline news, politicians will treat it as if it was solved. I'm referring to the purchasing of peripheral bonds. There has been signals from the ECB that they want to unload the 70B or so of bonds from their balance sheet and indirect that there is a limit on how much the ECB can/will hold. The political camp has been mute on this aspect but instead transformed the ECB proposal that the ESFS should by the ECB holdings to one where the ESFS funds should be used to buy more bonds from the market (Lesson: never provide a "how" to a "what" since your "how" will be stolen to solve another "what".)
In sum, JCT & the ECB are moving towards a position that the situation is, or should be, normalizing and that the political camp is responsible for that to happen - it is a sort of a fait accompli play and a rather sharp move for a non-political body...
I realize that I'm really wading in deep here with this first post, but the aspects that I bring up have not been discussed much in this forum.
As to terms, some quid pro quo not endangering eventual recovery is likely - I suggest a poll about how high Ireland's corporate tax rate will be post rescue :)