Forum
Posts by "montmorency"
678 Posts Total by "montmorency":
74
Posts by Anonymous "montmorency":
Davidau, I've now read at least 4 or 5 of your posts using the word "fool". It is not conducive to mutual respect. Let's try to learn from each other in a mutually respectful atmosphere, free of that kind of language. Many thanks.
For what it's worth, I think you may be right about gold, although I certainly do not claim to be an expert. I have been a "gold bull" (in theory, if not always in practice) for a long time though.
M.
With all this talk of parity, what do people think about the possibility of EUR/GBP parity some time in 2010?
It almost happened in 2009 (and I was surprised it didn't become established).
Also, unrelated, I have been wondering where to ask this question, and in a discursive mode again, and because it is relatively quiet, what do people feel is the balance between fundamental and technical in their own trading?
I ask because I tend to think of Ashraf's approach as being mainly fundamental, but from time to time he makes some strong technical points, and he is usually pretty accurate.
However, in my own mind and my own trading I can't quite reconcile these two approaches. Just to say where I am coming from: I've been trading (spread-betting) for about 2 years, in a fairly small way. Like most people I began to learn TA, and went through the whole multiple indicator experience, eventually ending up with a minimal-indicator, price-action approach, pretty well ignoring fundamentals. I then realised that I was missing something by ignoring fundamentals, and began to try to learn more about how the market worked and how all the currencies, commodities and the stock market fitted together. Clearly Ashraf's approach has helped enormously with trying to understand all that. (I have the book and workbook). However, once I got into fundamentals, I tended to find myself deprecating technicals altogether, which I see is NOT the way Ashraf works.
And now I'm unsure how much weight to give each approach.
Just to elaborate further, I've read some market analysts who seem to have a lot of knowledge of the market who have (at best) deep reservations about TA, even about such cornerstones as support and resistance.
So why, for example, if we believe that it's really fundamentals that drive the market, why on earth should we believe that some historical level from the past should have any bearing, whether as support or resistance, in the future? This is my dilemma.
The only answer I can come up with is the old "self-fulfilling prophecy" one, but I don't think it's all that satisfactory.
I would be interested to read anyone else's thoughts on this.
Thanks for your clarification. Interesting what you say about the spike in the USD index chart. One of the brokers I use showed it. Another didn't. The one who did seemed to correct it later, although it still showed a healthy jump. Fortunately, it didn't affect me either way, that is to say, the erroneous spike.
As it happened I _did_ buy EUR/USD at the wrong time (I thought it had dropped as far as it was going to. However, it came back in my direction eventually, as I expected it to (eventually :-) ). [Don't trade like this at home kids .... :-) ]
I agree it's as well to be prepared for what might happen. Everyone (not here necessarily, but in the wider world) seems to have written off the dollar, but there seem to be several scenarios in which it could stage recoveries or mini-recoveries, each one of which is a potential pip-generating opportunity (or pip-losing threat, of course).
Regards,
Montmorency
P.S. Xaron: Are you the same (BWILC) guy who posts on FF under that name? Interesting posts/blog.
What you wrote about the USD index may already be happening, perhaps sooner even than you expected. I suppose today's massive spike in the index (at least on my chart) was a rather exaggerated response to news/data, and it has already settled down again, but is still around the territory you mention.
Interesting times.
Regards,
Montmorency
I was not at all worried about spending the $79 and had absolutely committed myself to getting it just as soon as I'd obtained and read the hardback book (which got delayed in shipping apparently). I just was afraid of not being able to understand the workbook without having first read the hardback book; i.e. I was afraid of confusing myself by reading them in the "wrong" order. As it turned out, I didn't wait, and not long after that last posting purchased the workbook. Fortunately, soon after, Sat 24th to be precise, the hardcopy book arrived in the post after all, so I am very happy now. Just working my way through the hardcopy book, which I am sure will make the workbook more understandable & relevant. Thanks again for all the hard work on the book, the workbook, and on this site. Apologies if I didn't make my meaning clearer previously.
Now it's my turn to put in some hard work.
Best regards,
Montmorency
OK, Question for Ashraf: I have always intended to purchase the Workbook in addition to the printed book, but I figured it wouldn't make any sense to do this until I had read the printed book. Given that I probably still won't get to see the printed book for at least a couple of weeks now, is it worth my getting the workbook at this stage or won't it make much sense?
With thanks,
Regards,
Montmorency
http://www.buyusa.gov/uk/en/us_bank_holidays.html