Forum > View Topic (Article)
This thread was started in response to the Article:
S&P500 / VIX Ratio & USD LIBOR
On the cycles of the S&P500 / VIX ratio and the stabilizing cost of USD 3-month LIBOR relative to its yen counterpart.
Ashraf
do you have an estimated target price for S&P500? Do you think we will break below Feb's low? Just trying to get your feel on the severity of the sell-off.
Callum
Ashraf
I'm glad I'm not the only one swimming against the tide. What is interesting is that Bob Prechter was on CNBC on Friday calling a double top in the market - he talks a lot of sense and I respect his views - he's called the market down for a while now but with so much interference from the govts around the world he can't be blamed for getting his timing wrong - i.e. the markets are overshooting.
Looking back over the last 5 years on the DJIA the RSI is near its highs now. With India raising rates and China to follow soon we could be in for a rough few weeks as commodities sell off. My guess is for a shallow sell off before April followed by another high in April/May and then the resumption of the bear market thereafter.
G
The rational part is, as I was reading on the FT yesterday, large volume of options have been placed for the VIX to be 20/21 next month...meaning that the market IS expecting volatility in the near future.
I'm presently ging against the tide as well, so let's see...
Asad
have a lok at the related isssues of Basel iii
Making global liquidity more robust
20. The crisis vividly demonstrated that adequate liquidity is a prerequisite for financial stability.
The drying up of liquidity at the level of financial institutions, countries and ultimately the global system caused the seizing up of credit provision and of financial flows.
Cross-border flows are often the most vulnerable during financial crisis, and emerging markets can face damaging volatility in foreign exchange and liquidity flows.
21. Just as strong capital is a necessary condition for banking system soundness, so too is a strong liquidity base.
Many banks that had adequate capital levels still experienced difficulties during the crisis because they did not manage their liquidity in a prudent manner.
The lesson is that banks resilience to system-wide liquidity shocks affecting both market and funding liquidity must be significantly increased and their management of this risk strengthened.
22. To this end, we are substantially raising the bar for global liquidity risk regulation:
The Basel Committee will issue by the end of 2009 a new minimum global liquidity standard.
This new regulatory framework introduces a liquidity coverage ratio that can be applied in a cross-border setting.
It establishes a harmonised framework to ensure that global banks have sufficient high-quality liquid assets to withstand a stressed funding scenario specified by supervisors.
The Basel Committee will also formulate a structural ratio to address liquidity mismatches and promote a strong funding profile over longer-term horizons.
This new standard complements the supervisory guidance for banks liquidity risk management practices, the implementation of which is being assessed in supervisory reviews.
http://compliancereporter.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=2448991
what about necessary Liquidity Guidelines for sovereigns ?
What do you think about an overview of the responsible parameters, which determine availability repectively withdrawal of liquidity for stocks per se or comprehensive
Would it not be useful to have a calender with the important days or data to describe the development of the paradigma liquidity
I only want to remember, that the lack of liquidity was the most important catalysator for deepening the financial crisis